All Forums
 Other Sciences
Molality and Solutions

 Printer Friendly
 
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
STAii
X-Ray Wave


Jordan
1376 Posts
Posted - 02/19/2003 :  16:04:28  Show Profile Send a private Message
Two points that i am not getting, please help me understanding them:

1-Why is it that a solution of a material (say sugar) is water will raise the boiling point of the solution ?

2-Why does the the boiling point of the solution depends on the number of moles (of the material (eg sugar, salt ...)) ? (i see it must depend on the type of material, and the number of moles, but our textbook says that if you put 1 mole of ANY matterial (that does not get ionized and is in liquid or solid state) in 1 kg of water (as an example) then the boiling point of the solution will raise the same ammount no matter what is the matterial that you use !)

You've gotta be japaneese !

Alert Mentor now


Edited by - STAii on 02/22/2003 07:35:12
STAii
X-Ray Wave


Jordan
1376 Posts
Posted - 02/22/2003 :  07:36:25  Show Profile  Send a private Message
Anyone ? please ...



Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

Jikx
Radio Wave



25 Posts
Posted - 02/26/2003 :  10:24:47  Show Profile  Send a private Message
i'm not 100% sure about this.. but

1)

As the substance itself will absorb energy, less energy will be avaliable to the water hence the boiling poinst of the solution will increase (i.e more energy needed to be provided for the same effect).


2)

Because, mol is the AMOUNT (whatever zillions of atoms) of the substance.

But i'm not sure about this, as i thought that different materials have different values for how much energy they would absorb for a given temperature change. Eg, every mole of copper will require less (or is it more?) energy for an increase of 1degree then say a mole of iron.

Then again, there may be something fiddly with energy equilibrium, heat capacities and molar ratios..

i'm sorry, but thats about the limit i can do without resorting to the textbooks (which i incidentally sold) and doing some test sums.. hmm... :/

Edit -

just read thru my reply, realised it didn't make much sense and was probably wrong. Well, i am here to learn

Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page


Edited by - Jikx on 02/26/2003 10:27:31
STAii
X-Ray Wave


Jordan
1376 Posts
Posted - 02/26/2003 :  14:24:19  Show Profile  Send a private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Jikx:
i'm not 100% sure about this.. but

1)

As the substance itself will absorb energy, less energy will be avaliable to the water hence the boiling poinst of the solution will increase (i.e more energy needed to be provided for the same effect).



Heat energy is not the same as temprature, it is right that that the solution will need more energy to reach a certain temprature, but i don't see why not at the temprature 100o (where the water molecules will have this temprature too) it will not boil.
quote:

2)

Because, mol is the AMOUNT (whatever zillions of atoms) of the substance.



I understand this point , actually this is what i am asking about, why does it depend on the number of atoms/molecules and not their mass (and specific heat for example)

quote:

just read thru my reply, realised it didn't make much sense and was probably wrong. Well, i am here to learn


i guess we are all here for the same reason



Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

Chemicalsuperfreak
Infrared Wave


USA
417 Posts
Posted - 02/26/2003 :  19:33:10  Show Profile  Send a private Message
I'm just guessing here, I haven't looked it up. Adding a solute to water wil change its ionic strength, the degree to which the water molecules hydrogen bond with each other. Hydrogen bonding is what gives water its high boiling point, so mess with it and you'll get a different bp. It definately matters what the substance is, sugar is quite different than salt. But if your looking at 1 M versus 2 M, the difference in bp's might be small enough that a simple experiment might not notice it.

"mmm, sacralicious"- HJS

Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

STAii
X-Ray Wave


Jordan
1376 Posts
Posted - 02/26/2003 :  19:50:55  Show Profile  Send a private Message
Well the hydrogen bounds are re-made with the substance that you put in water instead of with water molecules themselves ...
And according to our textbook the BP depends only on the molality, and the substance that you are desolving IN.
So if you put 1 mole of sugar in water, or 1 mole of salt in water, you will get the same BP for both !
Any other explaination(s) ?



Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

Chemicalsuperfreak
Infrared Wave


USA
417 Posts
Posted - 02/27/2003 :  02:26:49  Show Profile  Send a private Message
quote:
Originally posted by STAii:
Well the hydrogen bounds are re-made with the substance that you put in water instead of with water molecules themselves ...
And according to our textbook the BP depends only on the molality, and the substance that you are desolving IN.
So if you put 1 mole of sugar in water, or 1 mole of salt in water, you will get the same BP for both !
Any other explaination(s) ?



Umm, each of the solute ions or molecules, as the case may be, is solvated by the water molecules, forming a cage like structure, called a clathrate, around the solute particle. There are hydrogen bonds formed between the solute and clathrae, between the clathrate and free water molecules, between the clathrate water molecules themselves, and between the free water molecules themselves. There's still plenty of hydrogen bonds between the free water molecules, otherwise you'd be talking about dissolving water in sugar instead of the other way around. In any case, dissolving materials in water changes the ionic strength of the solvent. And this depends on a property of the solute molecules known as "activity," and this would be drastically different between sugar and salt. What I'm saying is, I'm pretty sure your book is wrong. They don't spread sugar on snow to melt it.


"mmm, sacralicious"- HJS

Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

STAii
X-Ray Wave


Jordan
1376 Posts
Posted - 02/27/2003 :  07:13:43  Show Profile  Send a private Message
When i said that the hydrogen bounds are re-made, i was talking only about the hydrogen bounds that have been broken.
I guess i understand your point, i will try to find some articles to proove that our book is wrong.
Thanks a lot.



Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

Chemicalsuperfreak
Infrared Wave


USA
417 Posts
Posted - 02/27/2003 :  20:34:39  Show Profile  Send a private Message
quote:
Originally posted by STAii:
When i said that the hydrogen bounds are re-made, i was talking only about the hydrogen bounds that have been broken.
I guess i understand your point, i will try to find some articles to proove that our book is wrong.
Thanks a lot.



It's mostly wrong for compounds that associate or dissociate, that is, ionic compounds. For compounds that don't, like sugar, the effect on the ionic strength of the solution is small, and the boiling point elevation will depend on the molality.

"mmm, sacralicious"- HJS

Alert Mentor now Go to Top of Page

   

 Printer Friendly

 
load time: 0.7031